Smelly Media: Mo' womyn, mo' womyn, but through affirmative action

 

I was wondering how long it would take our new female finance minister utter some womyn's cause. It took her around one month.

Urpilainen wants more women in leading roles

Right.

And how is this supposed to be forced achieved?

By "gender quotas".

Finland, the country which prides itself for being one of the top in the list of gender parity, the country where women are (more) equal to men, in a country where women have unlimited opportunities, and unlimited choice,

And in a country which has soft affirmative action, by pushing women into high status jobs, by lowering standards where necessary, extensive maternal help;

And a country which has had this for some many decades;

In 2011,

Women need "gender quotas" to have a respectable amount of womyn in the higher echelons of the workforce.

This tells us three things:

One:

Womyn either are too frigging stupid to reach the higher echelons in numbers
Womyn either are too frigging dumb to reach the higher echelons in numbers
Womyn either are too frigging lazy to reach the higher echelons in numbers
Womyn either are too frigging uninterested to reach the higher echelons in numbers
Womyn either are too frigging  -insert fitting adjective - to reach the higher echelons in numbers

Or women make a choice not to put in the time, energy and effort into reaching those higher levels of careers. A choice which more men make.

Two:

Womyn always complain about the higher status jobs, as if every man is a CEO, or a Mayor...

This is because men of the not high statuses are invisible, the jobs that are not high status don't exist, they are accomplished by a mysterious life force, and the men who take these jobs are subhuman.

This, they do not say, but look at which jobs are a problem in equality. You will never see plumber, technician, electrician, dumpster driver, forester, etc etc...

Three:

If men and women are equal, does it matter who does the decision making?

You say it does, so I say that you claim that men and women are not equal. For you, women are more valuable.

If men and women are equal, would women need affirmative action to play the game?

You say they do, so I say that you demonstrate that you view men and women as not equal. For you, women are unable.

If men and women are equal, would you cheer that now women make 56% of the higher education students?

You cheer, so I say that you show that you view men and women as not equal. For you, women are more equal.

When I say "Men and women may be equal under law (which interestingly they are not, due to the PussyPass and HolyMamaSyndrome), but they are not the same"

You call me a sexist.

But you, by forcing affirmative action to enable more women to achieve, even if they  have the number's advantage anyway, show the world that women are either stupid, dumb, lazy, or simply uninterested.

Maybe it is time to stop beating around the bush?

Oh hey, and a fourth;

The men who get passed over in the name of gender quotas, even though they are more qualified for the job; how does that fit into equality? Their wives? I mean they are women. And every successful man is successful because of the woman. Right? So where is her acknowledgment?

Now we have to assume that having a vagina acts like an extra multiplier to the qualification, that will get the woman the job. If she is a bit qualified, use 1.3, if she is little qualified use 3, if she is not qualified still hire her. In GenderQuotaism, a vagina trumps all achievements.