Before I will be accused of not liking gays, I have nothing against gays, as long as they keep their private life out of my face, and their hands away from me.
Missionary organizations to lose funding over views on homosexuals
You see, the west is a free culture, the EU is a free collection of countries,
Free, as long as you parrot the party line of sodomy, vibrancy, enrichment, cultural and demographic suicide, and unending guilt for crimes not worse than other culture's.
In this free land, the anointed will decide what is acceptable and use other people's moneys to dictate these enlightened views.
The ladies have been offended.
The ass pirates have also been offended.
We must do something.
Out of hundreds of organisations, one organisation does not bend over backwards to please the gay minority (1%?) and the female minority (52%...????) and that has to be punished.
It is not like these parishes are running around shouting "stone the gays"; "drown the women" etc.. No, they just hold views that they do not want these groups in high positions in their organizations.
Punish the heretic.
How can they defile the Gods of Progression, The Goddesses of Tolerance?
At this point, it is the sensible thing, as soon the church possibly will order its male members to drink gay pxxx instead of red wine, and eat female sxxx instead of that holy bread.
Can't offend them, the LGBT saints, you see.
Wonder how many church members actually want to have gay priests,
"And Jeeeeesuuuuuussss... Boy you look good.... Why the cloth? Halllelluuujjaaaa"
Female priests:
"No sermon today. Got PMS"
Or a lesbian priest:
"Jesus was a pig. Men are pigs. God is a transgender. Mary was a lesbian"
Ah well...
I guess soon we shall outlaw
"In the name of the Father, the Son and the Holy Spirit"
As it is offensive.
(The following is a work of fiction. Names, characters, places, used language and incidents either are products of the author’s imagination or are used fictitiously. Any resemblance to actual events or locales or persons or objects, living or dead, is entirely coincidental, yada yada yada)
"It's mine"
"No mine!"
"You can't even fit it in"
"I got vaseline"
Third person coming in:
"Screw the cross.. I got the marble snake, gimme some of that vaseline", oops, out pops an apple.
In other news:
The feminazis have already been furious that Jesus is depicted as a man. His actual name was Destinee.
Btw,
The "Church has turned into a joke, Exhibit 1" is their turning their backs on the traditional family.That was the point when the church lost its way.
Missionary organizations to lose funding over views on homosexuals
You see, the west is a free culture, the EU is a free collection of countries,
Free, as long as you parrot the party line of sodomy, vibrancy, enrichment, cultural and demographic suicide, and unending guilt for crimes not worse than other culture's.
In this free land, the anointed will decide what is acceptable and use other people's moneys to dictate these enlightened views.
Oh oh oh...The Parish Union of Helsinki is planning to end financial support to three missionary organisations due to their negative attitudes towards the ordination of women and sexual minorities.
The ladies have been offended.
The ass pirates have also been offended.
We must do something.
Out of hundreds of organisations, one organisation does not bend over backwards to please the gay minority (1%?) and the female minority (52%...????) and that has to be punished.
It is not like these parishes are running around shouting "stone the gays"; "drown the women" etc.. No, they just hold views that they do not want these groups in high positions in their organizations.
Punish the heretic.
How can they defile the Gods of Progression, The Goddesses of Tolerance?
The Parish Union annually gives three percent of its tax revenue—some three million euros—to foreign aid. The money is channelled through several missionary organisations and Finn Church Aid, which carries out humanitarian work.Actually the news is not clear. They are talking about the church tax, from which one can opt out, but also lose right to church services.
At this point, it is the sensible thing, as soon the church possibly will order its male members to drink gay pxxx instead of red wine, and eat female sxxx instead of that holy bread.
Can't offend them, the LGBT saints, you see.
Wonder how many church members actually want to have gay priests,
"And Jeeeeesuuuuuussss... Boy you look good.... Why the cloth? Halllelluuujjaaaa"
Female priests:
"No sermon today. Got PMS"
Or a lesbian priest:
"Jesus was a pig. Men are pigs. God is a transgender. Mary was a lesbian"
Ah well...
I guess soon we shall outlaw
"In the name of the Father, the Son and the Holy Spirit"
As it is offensive.
Following heated public debate on the church's attitude towards homosexuals, the Parish Union took a more critical look at its partner organisations.I can now hear some discussion about what to do with the cross...
(The following is a work of fiction. Names, characters, places, used language and incidents either are products of the author’s imagination or are used fictitiously. Any resemblance to actual events or locales or persons or objects, living or dead, is entirely coincidental, yada yada yada)
"It's mine"
"No mine!"
"You can't even fit it in"
"I got vaseline"
Third person coming in:
"Screw the cross.. I got the marble snake, gimme some of that vaseline", oops, out pops an apple.
In other news:
The feminazis have already been furious that Jesus is depicted as a man. His actual name was Destinee.
Btw,
The "Church has turned into a joke, Exhibit 1" is their turning their backs on the traditional family.That was the point when the church lost its way.
Good post. I agree.
ReplyDeleteIt's been a while since I checked your site.
ReplyDeleteWelcome back Svar.
ReplyDeleteWhy do you underestimate your audience, finndistan?
ReplyDelete"Before I will be accused of not liking gays, I have nothing against gays, as long as they keep their private life out of my face, and their hands away from me."
Clearly you do, in fact, have something against gay: otherwise you would not write this kind of garbage. You do not expect heterosexual people to "keep their private life out of your face". It doesn't look like you keep your sexuality in the closet either. You hold gay people to a different standard from others, expect them to behave differently: that's precisely what "having something against" means.
I'm all for the right of the church to spend its Euros for whatever it wishes, but I welcome their wish to move on from the Middle Ages. There is no parroting of feminazist ideology or ass pirate propaganda here, only the triumph of reason.
"Triumph of reason", lol. Looks like an ass pirate got butthurt, the irony. The church does need to become "progressive" because that's not what Christianity is about.
ReplyDeleteAs for fags, they are a very small minority and since the heterosexual majority is repulsed by their actions, it is best for them to be discrete.
Leftist thought and reason is mutually exclusive.
Anon.
ReplyDeleteI have something against gay, since I do not participate is "Hetero Pride" parade, which would get me imprisoned for societal sexual harrasment.
And I have something against gays when they try to impose their way of life to the kids in sex ed. It is not enough to say "Some can be different, if you feel so, we have special counselling", no, ass piracy needs to be taught in classroom.
About the church, if the book says no female priests (for a reason), no gay priests (what, the boy molesting scandals of the last years were committed by straight priests?), then the book says so.
And the church has no right to use taxpayer money to progress under left ideology.
The only thing the church is to follow is the book, and basic human rights.
Not some drivel about PC, multiculti, diversity, signle women go to heaven, straight men are evil but gay are not straight so they go to heaven...
Etc.
Also, if I say, "Fat people keep your sexy clothing at home", I will be accused of having something against fat people.
What if I do?
What if I do not want rolls of sweaty fat blubbling in front of my face because a woman is wearing a belly open shirt.
Yes, I have something against it.
The whole society has something against straight men (and married mothers), our problem is not one little tiny blogger from the godforsaken frozen lands having something against gays going dental surgery on eachother.
BTw, what you call "triumph of reason" is exactly that. Propagating feminist ideology, and its related components that make the other arms of the poisonous parasitic octopus.
Svar,
A few weeks after I decided there is some mental issue with people following marx, I came across the book Liberalism is a Mental Disorder; have not read it but I expect the illogicality of the left will cause this notion to gain ground fast.
Got to make something clear:
ReplyDeleteIf my comment seems harsh or something, got to keep in mind that whenever I or someone else utters anything close to being remotely unPC, we are told that what we say is not consistent/congruent/hateful/bigoted and so on, when for every word we utter, millions of words are printed and broadcasted in the media, in the politics, in the society that voice the other, the PC side.
For one man saying gays should keep their private life private, or at least not french kiss in front of my face,
A million instances of "straight men are pigs" coupled with comparable of instances "we need new laws" are uttered.
As if this assault, attack, brainwashing is not enough, I am told that what I say is not right to say.
What I said will not cause a thousandth of the damage that for example the clusterf%k of a movie, Zack and Miri make a Porno will have caused.
* damage to any arbitrary party
ReplyDeleteSvar: "The church does need to become "progressive" because that's not what Christianity is about."
ReplyDeleteFinndistan: "About the church, if the book says no female priests (for a reason), no gay priests (what, the boy molesting scandals of the last years were committed by straight priests?), then the book says so."
Homosexuality is not the first issue on which the church has changed its mind - and it won't be the last.
I'm not a member of the church, and I don't really care a lot about what it does. The reason I do, for even a bit, is that I have to live with its influence on our society. And for that reason I welcome any change that's away from its medieval line of thought.
Maybe the church doesn't follow the scripture, but then again, it might have been better if a lot of that stuff had never been written in the first place.
Besides, what does "leftism" have to do with this? One of the MPs most actively pushing for gay marriage, Lasse Männistö, probably considers himself very much non-left. As do I. Don't mix terms that have nothing to do with each other.
Finndistan: "And I have something against gays when they try to impose their way of life to the kids in sex ed. It is not enough to say "Some can be different, if you feel so, we have special counselling", no, ass piracy needs to be taught in classroom."
I'm not even sure what you're talking about - it's been a while since I last visited a classroom. Do they teach kids how to perform anal sex these days? I doubt it.
Svar: "As for fags, they are a very small minority and since the heterosexual majority is repulsed by their actions, it is best for them to be discrete."
No. We live in a democracy, not in a tyranny of the majority. Minorities have rights - in this case, no matter how repulsed you (what right do you have to speak for "the majority"?) are by homosexuals, they have every right to be as vocal about their doings as they want.
And if attitudes like this still persist, they should.
Finndistan: "If my comment seems harsh or something, got to keep in mind that whenever I or someone else utters anything close to being remotely unPC, we are told that what we say is not consistent/congruent/hateful/bigoted and so on, when for every word we utter, millions of words are printed and broadcasted in the media, in the politics, in the society that voice the other, the PC side."
That could be true. I find myself in a similar position on some other issues.
Doesn't mean, though, that you should get away with saying stupid stuff such as "gays should keep their private life private, or at least not french kiss in front of my face". If straight people have the right to french kiss in front of your face, so do homosexuals.
I like your approach anon, civilized and no name calling. Different from what I experience when I say "But men die 7 years earlier", and suddenly I am a sexist pig. So, thank you.
ReplyDeleteYou see, what was not clear is that I believe the church as a church is dead. Yes, hundreds of years ago, the church has done evil things and has put forward evil actions, but not anymore.
What the gays are doing is, they want to enter the basketball field, play in the basketball team, with the basketball rules, but actually play football, I dont know if this analogy is understandable.
I am all for the religion changing with the times, since we are not anymore living in the sandlands where heating consists of wood and dung; but human character stays same. So, some things cannot progress, because if they do, they will fall prey to the non-progressing character of humanity, be it greed, be it lust, be it love.
Since I see Finnish politics of everything left of the center to some extent, looking at the main policies, (i.e. gay marriage is a minor nail on the coffing of marriage, which with 50+% divorce rate is done for,), i do not see a point in taking back on calling the gay and female priest issue a leftist issue since it is one of the operating fields of cultural marxism.
Also one PM from the center party being for gay marriage, does not change the existence of the orchestrated attempt to undermine western society and what is left of values, coming from the followers of Marx.
And if the gays are so concerned about the church's views on them, there is a bigger, growing institution that should make them scared sh%tless.
About the classroom, the news was just out about making sex ed minority friendly, so if not already, in the next year they likely will. And since the officials love to take sweden as an example, we can expect even worse stuff in the coming school years. Like the SCUM manifesto derived theater play being shown to high school kids.
We live in a democracy, not in the tyranny of the majority, but we are approaching very fast the tyranny in the name of some minorities. PC sees to that.
See, just in the last few weeks we had news on how women earn less for different work, how the economic crisis has forced women back into kitchen, how even if the data shows that men work more, the title of the article was men have more free time, etc,
The lone wolf is the one saying: Motherhood is to be cherished.
And when I say to the gays to keep their french kissing off my face, it is not much different that your normal next door girl calling the nerd from school a loser.
With the difference being, the gays never will not experience any enforcement coming from me, while the nerd is screwed in that social circle.
And like I said, in any case what I said is answered a thousand more times in the media, in the gays are cool articles, in the gays know best articles, in the straight men are pigs articles etc, that its gets drowned out before I can even finish my phrase.
Another example: If I like to pick my nose and then lick my snot, put it in my ear, twirl it around, then put it in my mouth, chew on it and then burp out of sexual fulfillment and a love of snot, shall a gay person sitting across the table expected to be totally ok with it?
And yes, believe it or not, I see this as an apt analogy when it comes to sexual preferences.
Anon, if you have no interest in faith, then why do you feel the need to bitch about it? Why do you feel the need to force your views upon the Church? Why are you so bothered with the existence of the Scriptures?
ReplyDeleteYour silly views are that of the Left. Your shaming tactics are that of the Left. Your shrill tone is that of the Left. Just own up to what you are. A leftist, through and through.
As for the "medieval" line of thought, that is a standard leftist argument against the church. Human nature has no changed and your so-called "progress" is unsustainable. History goes in degenerative cycles not towards a leftist paradise.
ReplyDeleteAlso, the Church has not changed it's views on homosexuality. Some leftist churches have and in doing so, have ceased to be Christian churches but churches evangelizing the leftist zeitgeist.
ReplyDelete