The EUcrats are not totalitarian, continues the media to claim

Of course they are not totalitarian, they are post-totalitarian... They passed the points of totalitarianism long time ago; the only difference is that since the citizens of the EU are sheeple, we do not see the brown shi(r)ts, or the army control of fascism.

EU Commission demands changes to Finnish driving laws

The European Commission has referred Finland and Portugal to the EU's Court of Justice over their failure to adopt national legislation updating 2009 driver's license requirements.

Ahh. the EU courts of justice, of human rights... The overlord of all of us. 

Finland has yet to fully transpose a directive into law that will ease requirements for people with deteriorated eyesight, diabetes and epilepsy to gain licenses. The deadline to amend rules on driver's licenses was in September 2010.

Right...

Look, all around us is white in daytime, and very bad visibility in darkness due to all the lamps on the street getting reflected into your eyes from all sides... and it is dark for 16 hours, at some point.

The windshields are frozen, it takes time to defrost totally...

And so on.

And the EUcrats sitting in Brussels of course once again want to change laws they have no idea about. 

The 2009 amending directive represents an advantage to those with these conditions because it adapts previous fitness requirements to scientific progress made in the treatment of these impairments.

Yea... Just like men have to do 20 pushups in the army and women 20 pushups from the knees.

One thing is forgotten though:

Just like army equipment does not discriminate between sexes, sunlight coming in from 15degrees (summer mornings, straight into your eye) does not discriminate between eyesight.

Hey,

EUcrats, here is one more thing:

Mandatory headlights.  Headlight are mandated to be on all the time; in summer to counter the low hanging nightsun, and in the winter the non-present light.

You know, it increases emissions, those 50watt lamps.

Ban the usage of mandatory on headlights!

You got the power!

One question about illegals; and an interesting wordplay of the stinky as usual media

Russians bringing West Africans into Finland illegally?

Read the title, then read the quotes. I mixed up the order of the quotes.

...

Last September, the Border Guard of South Eastern Finland apprehended two Ivoirians who arrived on the Allegro train at the Vainikkala border crossing point in Lappeenranta. Their passports contained forged visas and Greek residence permits. A third Ivoirian immigrant was detained separately. They have since applied for asylum in Finland.
...

One question to the human rightists:

These people decided to break the laws of the target country before even having entered it.

What does that say about the prediction of their future behavior or intent?

Will entering Finland suddenly change a law breaker into a law abiding person?

And since you, the human rightists will be up and ready, fully armed with rhetoric to save these souls,

I want to ask you,

What about us, the law abiding immigrants? The working immigrants who are not parasiting off the system, who are not asking the host culture to adapt to us, the ones who do not show up on police or perpetual welfare statistics?

What wrong did we ever do to you that our rights are not worth dogcrap to you?

Are we not vibrant enough?

Is our non-vibrancy actually bad because us not making it to the statistics undermine your funding and feel good ideology?

A Rwandan-born Russian citizen who arranged the trips was arrested a few days later on suspicion of aggravated arrangement of illegal immigration. He was detained when he tried to leave Finland

Why does the title then not say "Russia based criminal gang", "Criminal New-Russians" etc, but says "Russians"?

I am aware that the Russians will not let anybody run an illegal operation without their consent, but the officials did not catch an Ivan, did they?

Is this not undeserved racial profiling against the ethnic Russians when already they got stamped on the stereotype of being criminals?

Or, is it ok for Russians to be stereotyped, because their race is not a protected one?

Control the words, control the vote; media guiding the sheeple

Spotlight on Finland's 2012 presidential election

Should read

Guiding light for the sheeple on Finland's 2012 presidential election

Let's see:

In the decisive second round of the Finnish presidential election on February
5, Pekka Haavisto of the Green League is challenging long-time frontrunner
Sauli Niinistö of the conservative National Coalition Party (NCP). Both can
be seen as representing the pro-EU, affluent, urban elite of southern
Finland, leaving many voters without a candidate they can firmly support. So
who are these men and what are the real differences between them?

The news outlet, in light of its previous writings is talking of course about the proletariat having no candidate to vote for.

Of course, the proletariat had two candidates to vote for, but that is conveniently ignored.

What is also ignored is the people who never had a candidate, or had their candidate under attack by the media; the non-PC crowd:

Here are some people who are also missing a vote:

The ones who think Finland is not a "Schlaraffenland" that should distribute its hard earned wealth with a mass of unassimilables, unintegratables, unemployable and uneducatables. The only candidate who would be representing them had a legendary counter-campaign run against him from whole media, politic bodies and social institutions. And he got 10%.

The ones who think that state and state protected corporate monopoly should be broken up through competition.

The ones who think that a welfare state in a country of 5 million running on 2.500.000 million working age people, out of whom 250.000 are unemployed and 250.000 are in early retirement/disabled retirement/psychological retirement cannot continue. 

The ones who think in any way (bit more) other than PC MC diktats have no candidate. Screw candidate, they have no free speech.

Haavisto: In registered partnership with Ecuadorian-born hairstylist Nexar
Antonio Flores since 2002. First openly gay presidential candidate.

Just like there will be people voting for him because a gay president will make Finland look good; there will be people voting against him because he is gay. As a coincidence, the people I know on facebook who were supporting Obama just because he is black are the same people who support Haavisto. Just a little observation. 

The important stuff:

Key issues

Niinistö: Fiscal austerity, lower taxation, competitiveness, EU
unity. Believes the presidential right to pardon prisoners should be revoked
and that stronger action should be taken against illegal strikes. Questions
the right of same-sex couples to marry. Considered to be pro-EU and
pro-NATO.

Haavisto: Conflict resolution, tolerance, the environment,
gender-neutral marriage. Favours a strong EU, firmly opposes Finnish NATO
membership.

Let's translate:

Niinistö: Hard choices that may give some chance to future generations, letting the productive have more of what they earned instead of Robin Hooding it into the black hole of welfare (note: they will never touch the taxes of the elite),  EU unity ueber alles. Presidential pardon of prisoners is of no interest to me, no translation; illegal strikes are illegal, and in a country with unions stronger than God, at least something should be left for the state to do. Am not sure about the gay couples marrying. What next? Adoption of male gay couples when we let fathers rot alone in their home when a bitter mother is involved. Pro-EU (we're screwed), Pro-Nato (at least he thinks that when one day China decides to walk, and Russians choose the east over west,  something shall be done against it.

Haavisto: Kumbayya, kumbayya, kumbayya, gays want to suffer through divorce, it is their right, strong EU (translator input error...), when Chinese decide to walk and the Russians decide to join them, we will stay at the borders, light some incense sticks and sing Kumbayya.

What is more interesting is what the media portrays as other important issues:

"Gay couples should have the right to marriage, not just registered
partnerships."

Niinistö: Somewhat disagree.
Haavisto: Completely agree.

Seriously, who the fuck cares? Marriage is dead.

Foreign woman, finnish man: 30% divorce rate
Finnish woman, finnish man: 50% divorce rate
Finnish woman, foreign man: 70% divorce rate

Children to unmarried mothers through the roof, single motherhood state encouraged,

And I am to care about gay getting married? Hell, let them suffer like straight men suffer through divorce and all, can't care a bit.

And this is the important topic?

"Rescuing the planet requires giving up on the goal of constant growth."

Niinistö: Somewhat disagree.
Haavisto: Completely agree.

Finns were 3 million in 1910... 5 million in 2010... now that is some growth.

If Haavisto is talking about places where mothers are breeding faster than rabbits, yes, I agree. But, he is not.

Fuck me if I am curtailing my already low consumption when some man somewhere is making 15 kids when he can't feed 1.

"The president should more strictly demand that China respect human
rights, even if it would harm economic ties."

Niinistö: Somewhat disagree.
Haavisto: Completely agree.

It won't harm economic ties, it will make things a bit more just. You can't have a free market when one side is regulated to death, and the other is subsidized to be totally free.

You either need to deregulate the regulated to death part, and let it breathe, or regulate the worker killing environment destroying, colonizing side.

"The president's spouse should have a visible role in society."

Niinistö: Agree somewhat.
Haavisto: Completely disagree.

Yes, our third biggest issue...
Well, I,for one, want to know who my president chose (or was able to get) for a relationship.

"Finland will be a more difficult place for today's youth to succeed
than it was for their parents."

Niinistö: Somewhat disagree.
Haavisto: Completely agree.

One thing is for sure, the grandparents worked like dogs to make this place, the parents worked like dogs to make this place but voted the socialists and the Kumbayya chorus in, so will the youth work? Be able to work? Be able to make a difference? Or just sit back, sing Kumbayya, roll a joint, and open the welfare check?

"A president should be prepared to give up on his or her privacy."

Niinistö: Agree somewhat.
Haavisto: Completely disagree.

Same as above.
a president's private life is important if the same man/woman in the same suit/dress is supposed to lead a country.


So, after the president's own declarations of important topics, which can be summed up as

N: "Something needs to be done"
H: "Kumbayya";

The media tells us about the most important factors:

Gay marriage
Environmentalism and west's sacrifice
China's human rights (not environment?...)
President's spouse
Jobs for youth compared to their parents' when they were young
President's private life.

Maybe they should have added what the candidates think about the sex tapes from the Finnish Big Brother Show, would make a nice fitting addition.

In the end, the whole election is about

A man who was married to Miss Finland, only to marry another;
A man who is gay.

Intermission: Control the words.... (no media link)

Will write a post about the elections and what the two successful candidates are saying,

Before that, want to remind you about all the cries that the left has gone unrepresented, and the workers have gone unrepresented.

Since we have universal suffrage, i.e.: worker, employer, employee, jobless, retired, parasite; all get to vote;

And the two left candidates got 14% in total, (since calling the Greens not left is wordplay, nothing else, and they got a whopping 20%)

To say that the left has gone unrepresented and the workers have gone unrepresented is wordplay; it is dishonest journalism, partisan journalism, ideological debauchery...

See, the votes tell us these things:

The workers did not want to vote for what the left stands for (for a second, considering the Greens are not counted as left, which is a ridiculous assessment)

The left did not want to vote for what the left stands for

The left, the all knowing totalitarian well meaning left, only comprises 14% of the population, not the majority of the people. The left is not the people's party.

Even counting the Greens as left, the left gets 34% in total... Still not enough to actually say "the majority wants socialism"

The pro-finn party got 10%, which is a tipping point, and set only to rise.

Thus,

The left is represented,

The worker is represented,

They just do not want the left to represent them.

Considering that this country is an up until now somewhat successful welfare state in a love affair with socialism, bridled with fitting state propaganda (called the Finn consensus),

Is this not the left's

Epic fail?

Control the language, control the minds - Media -

The strength of the media comes from its access to millions of minds, and these minds' susceptibility to subtle messages.

Besides hatchet jobs, another way a successful attack can be managed is by ridicule. If you can't destroy your enemy, ridicule him. will have the same effect.

Media controls the words that go into the minds of millions, and if it is a state owned almost monopoly media, the effect is catastrophic.

Now we have the presidential election season in Finland, and of course the media is the nuke in this race.

Let's see some examples:

News report: Finns' love affair with euroscepticism fading

Look at the word selection. "Love affair".. intended to make the 20% vote jump of the Finns party a juvenile interest by the Finns. A joke. Nothing serious...

"Looka here, the rightist populist dimwit did not even get 10% of the vote... Hiyyaaa... did you have enough with your immature play of wanting a genuine government and a leadership that lookes out for you, not some other xenohead" is the message.

Simple, subtle, ultra effective. and treacherous.

But as we will see in later news, things are not a simple. The "rightwing populist dimwit" may be more tolerant than is portrayed by the fully hating media, his voters more intelligent than portrayed, and the almost 10% vote not that bad... P.s.: I use "dimwit" for a politician whose rightwing views I support (i.e. he is so on the left about tax issues, that just these policies would make him left of center.. but I digress), because that is what the media portrays him as, without using this word.

Once again: This is not what I think of him. I respect the man. I respect the party. And I think they fullfill a very important function in the treasonous waters of European politics where sovereignty is in the gutters and people's rights do decide on their own fate when departing from the party line has been decimated. It is the media that thinks otherwise of these "potato farmers", "tomato farmers".

The first round of the presidential election was a victory for National Coalition Party candidate Sauli Niinistö. The drama came as the Greens' Pekka Haavisto won the other berth in the second-round run-off. Pundits saw this as a backlash against last year's surge for the right-wing Finns Party.

Niinistö was always popular, where this Haavisto came from was a surprise to me. But to note for the next news, Haavisto is green.


Haavisto could get Soini's vote

The populist, right-wing Finns’ Party’s chair Timo Soini is considering whether to vote for the Green candidate Pekka Haavisto in the second round of the presidential election.

Soini received 9.4 percent of the vote in the first round. Soini and his party have been harshly criticised for members’ coarse comments about minorities of all kinds, so his position towards openly gay Haavisto came as a surprise to some observers.
...

Soini’s own poor showing, compared to his support at the parliamentary election, was not necessarily a verdict on his party and their values.

“Timo Soini’s campaign didn’t have the same energy and motivation as the Finns’ party did in the parliamentary election,” said YLE election pundit Ville Pernaa. “At the same time his supporters were never sure whether they wanted Soini to be president or to continue as the party chair.”

...

Emphasis mine.

So Soini got 9.4%. Rightwing populist racist party. (as the media portrays it)

And "minorities of all kinds"...

Uhhhmmm... No.

They do not talk about minorities that respect the Finnish culture. Not about minority members who respect the laws... Who work.. Pay taxes...

Ok, they do talk some about the Swedish speaking minority who has had a disproportionate control of the economy and the politics and has been the main driving force in this enriching limitless immigration movement, thinking that minorities will support other minorities, namely the Swedish minority.

The one minority that the party members have talked against is the protected minority. And talking about that protected minority is enough to end careers. And lives.

That minority is not women (52% of society, what a minority), gays, lesbian, bis, transgenders, the chinese, the french, the cubans etc.

They spoke against the one minority which does not tolerate any other minority once it is a majority.

Thus, "minorities of all kinds" is correct once you factor that in.

Yea, am talking about "birds" from the Hitchcock's movie, the Birds. Nothing else. you know those Birds flying in the sky? Yea, that is what I am talking about. Look at what they did in the movie; those birds.


Pundit: Left's election result 'catastrophic'

Once again.

Catastrophic for the left? (Yes. Deservedly so)

Catastrophic for Finland? (Why?)

Two candidates from the left got 14% of the votes in total. I repeat: Two candidates. But the Finns candidate, Soini, who got 10% by himself, when his voters do not want to see him as a president with no powers but a prime minister who can do something, is the sign of the end of the "love affair"?

This is partisan journalism, nothing else.

And;

Note the grouping of left in the next news:

Finland to choose between liberal and conservative in second round

The second round of Finland’s presidential election will be a battle between
conservatives and liberals, with Finland’s political left unrepresented.

Hahahahahaha...

Liberal not left? (in some point in history that may have been true)

Green party not left?

That is like calling Jesus a Roman Emperor.

If there is one in the socialist pact, it is the Greens.

If there is one playing by the communist's bible, it is the Greens.

If there is one supported by the (funnily pro-big-daddy-state) Antifa thugs, it's the Greens.

Hell, the God of Greens is Marx,

And the left is not represented?

You shitting me?

The left’s absence from the second round is unprecedented, with voters left
without a straight left-right choice for the first time.

Because, Green is a colour, not a political side?

”There is not a pure bourgeois versus socialist configuration,” said Pernaa.
“Now the battle is for the working class soul, in that neither Niinistö nor
Haavisto is a candidate working class voters can relate to.”

Bwwwwaaaahahahahahahahha...

Guess which books out pundit reads?

Where his allegiance lies.

An ideology that has managed to kill more workers than any other ideology, in the name of workers.

“Niinistö is bourgeois and more conservative,” said Pernaa. “City-dwellers,
liberals, greens and those who swear by tolerance.

Intending to mean that Niinistö is intolerant.

Intending to mean that tolerance it the ultimate good, and end on itself.

I tell one thing,

In this socialized system, in this ueber-tolerant system (that tolerates everything except ones that stand up against real intolerance),

If these people get even more power, we are all f¤¤ked.

Once someone told that "Democracies (universal suffrage)are voting yourself to someone else's money"; a view that I fully believe in;

And as things grow, democracy has turned into voting yourself into voluntarily oblivion, voting your children to be countryless.

...Tolerance as the end of all... Fucking idiots. Assuming from their high seats of "We are better human beings", thinking all cultures are same and equal, that tolerance is a universally accepted and cherished idea, as an end by itself... It will be an end by itself.

The end.

"But i felt good, to sing kumbayya"

The end.

"But I was tolerant, and I sang kumbayya"

The end.

he end.

e end.

end.

end.

nd.

d.

.

Walfared, but lonely; the living dead - Smelly Media-

Welfare! Social state! State support! Taking care of its citizens!

Ok, the last point I am not an enemy of, but there is a rule: "The rule of unintended consequences"

All this feel good policing... Giving support to single mothers to the extent that fathers are not needed (with basically all men forced to pay (PC: tax) women to have raise their dysfunctional womb turds), and so creating a generation of dysfunctional kids; is just an example of unintended consequences.

But there is a clearer one, which of course is once again downplayed by the media's left hanging di....


Elderly left in hospital care for Xmas

People are becoming increasingly reluctant to bring their elderly hospitalised
relatives home for Christmas. Hospitals say a clear change has been
witnessed over the past decade.

When the state takes over the responsibilities of families, at some point some (which turns out to be most) families will let those responsibilities go.

This is no surprise.

The state took over the care of the elderly, you know, in the name of the elderly. It was a task too much for families. I mean these families don't even have time for little babies, looking forward to the day some government worker will take on the role of parenting once the baby is 12 months old.

So now, these families are letting their elderly taken care of rot in the hospital for christmas.

Yes, daddy government can provide care, it can provide financial support, but can it provide the love and caring of a family?

Apparently in the quest for the welfare state, another casualty is the souls of the elderly. The body alive and taken care of, the soul rotting in loneliness, hoping for time to pass so that the nurse comes for vitals check, only to see some living being, even if this human is only there because the pay is doubled for Christmas days.

Tinsel and artificial Christmas trees decorate hospitals around the country
this holiday season. Work in the patients’ ward may be difficult, but the
personnel try to generate Christmas cheer— donning elf hats and singing
carols.

My respects go out to these people who are forfeiting their own families to take care of those in need.

Once more the question is,

Would those elderly want to be in the hospital between those white walls, alone except the people paid to be there, or would that elderly be with the children and the grandchildren, who sadly are more interested in playing with their new ipads instead of listening stories of a life lived through thick and thin?

How many lonely christmases would these elderly forfeit, just to have one christmas with the family?

Can daddy government give you love?

“We’re trying to make it feel at least a bit like Christmas would at home,”
says Merja-Liisa Kaaronen, who heads hospital services of Asikkala–Padasjoki
in southern Finland.

My respects.

Kaaronen says that part of the reason is the weak physical condition of the
hospitalised elderly. Patients’ health may not always allow for home visits. Long
distances also play a role.

There was a time overcoming these factors was a reason for pride in families, it was a way to show the elderly that they are loved and cherished.

Excuses do not hide the fact that an families are losing the first rule of families: Love and care.

Gimme my Ipad.

I know in some cases it is near to impossible o take care of some of the elderly in bad health conditions, but how many are that? How many are just that the strond and independent children just did not want to have the elderly around?

“Relatives often live far away, so family Christmas is not celebrated like it
was before,” Kaaronen notes.

Yea.  I take 12 to 24 hour long trips (one way) to see family.

These families that are reluctant to take these trips today, will get to feel what it is to be a lonely old person in the ward where living is more like breathing with a fying soul.

Will daddy government provide love to revive that soul?

Can daddy government cure this loneliness?

What other casualties of the "rule of unintended consequences" are there?

When fathers have to be supervised.... -Smelly Media-

... is another sign that the system is the enemy of men.

This notion that fathers are dangerous for children goes against most of the child abuse studies that show mothers are equally or (way) more capable of dishing out abuse to their children as fathers are.

Oh, why I say this supervision is meant to supervise visiting fathers:

1. Even if the law talks about equal custody, mothers get the custody 90% of the time.
Yes, in this "one of the most gender equal societies", a man that I know got the custody of his child after three years of court battles only after the mother was caught for the zillionth time, doing drugs; and many more cases where the mother is on welfare and has the kids, and has moved to some other town. That the father is a sane, healthy, working man does not bother the equalist laws. Where some are apparently more equal than others.

2. If this supervision was to watch mothers, already our president would be up declaring that this is unacceptable, and we need to end this discrimination; holding hands with all the leftie femmie organizations that there is. The silence of the crickets tells us that this is not about mothers.



Supervised visitation grows into business

In Helsinki, monitored family visits have become a lucrative business for firms stepping into fill the void left by under resourced social welfare units.

Where there is a demand, there will be supply. Even vultures satisfy a demand.

So there is a demand. Once again, from known behavior, the demand comes from the ladies.

What does that mean?

Means, mothers willingly deny a child the private bonding time with the father because of their personal grudge (Exceptions exist); while most of the time shacking up with some other dude who has more interest in fucking than fathering.

Mother? or Cunt? (Exceptions exist)

Backlogs stemming from a lack of case workers have sent parents to seek out private visitation providers.

"Parents" = mothers.

If fathers were the ones seeking supervision, we would have a war against this partner (seperated?) abuse done by father.

Of course YLE as it does most of the time, is once again playing with words, but let's see what this demand means for the family finances:

At an hourly rate of 85 euros, parents in Helsinki’s Malmi district can contract Mental Capital Care. Paying out of pocket has not deterred parents, according to Petu Tapio, who heads the company.

Means,

Mother demands, father pays.

85 effing euros for seeing your kid, some of the time added to the costs of driving hundreds of kilometers for a two day visit... Money that could be payed to buy a present for the kid, or money that could be put into an education fund.

Way to go ladies, way to go.

Sacrificing your children's future because you cannot have a child bond with its father in private.

If this is not abuse through control freakery, what is it?

Smelly Socialism: Money for welfare, no money for police

A smelly media post, but media did nothing smelly this time. 

Say what you will, Thatcher was right, "Socialism lasts until your run out of someone else's money", that is until you bleed everyone dry in name of your social policies.

This just in:


Police cannot guarantee citizens' safety due to savings pressures

As much as I distrust media, politicians, socialists, multi cultists etc, that same distrust does not extend to the police. Due to their life on the streets, they are faced with reality, which is not pc diverse multikulti kumbayya.

I for one feel safer when I see a police car, nowadays 3 - 4 in a row, in a city whose face has changed in the past years.

The police can no longer guarantee the safety of all citizens across the country, warns National Police Commissioner Mikko Paatero. While increased savings pressures have cut police resources, violent crime is on the rise. 

Damn Finns... They must be getting more violent every passing day. 

The National Police Commissioner was speaking on YLE TV 1 Ykkösaamu morning television show.
According to Paatero, police work is being undermined by the need to save money. 

 And two days ago in the news was the article that the childcare needed more money.

I bet you a month's salary that the childcare (child indoctrination institute) will get the money.

But the police? The guys who put their life in the line? Nope, they get no money. They are racisssss anyway. Just look at their arrest records... Bloody racissssss's... Don't they know that singing kumbayya works better than jail bars?

Because, as you know security is a social construct.

Thus, having festivals like "Celebrate Diversity" will indeed lower crime.

Also the politic group and the social sciences will soon change the words. Like, "Assault" will turn into "Accidental fist connection to the nose"...

Everything is relative.

Police unemployment

The new government program aims to cut police funding by 10 million euros over the next five years. Due to the cuts, the police force will decrease by about 200 police every year.

Police stations to be closed

Paatero also sees many police stations closing due to increased savings pressures.

You got to keep in mind, this is a big number for a small country...

Welcome the hellhole where you got free medical care, but are dead.

When the criminals know there is no danger... there is danger for the non-criminal.

But hey, the social scientists have no problem. Once they introduce newspeak about crime, we will have no crime. Only houses that were shared, bodies that were shared, and wallets that were shared.

Violent crime on the rise

While savings pressures are forcing police to cut their operations, crime levels in Finland are growing.

According to as of yet unpublished crime statistics, violent crime has gone up a staggering 20 percent from the previous year. Crimes against property have also increased.

Paatero finds the increase in violent crime especially worrying. The National Police Commissioner sees some of the violence as stemming from social marginalisation, which he singles out as the biggest threat to internal security.

Very grim numbers,

On the last sentence, I disagree. For the same sentence I am also aware that him saying what I am saying would be a swift end to his long career.

The biggest threat to security is the left liberal pc policies of not profiling,

And what if the marginalisation happens because the marginals have no interest in non-marginalisation? The society has give more than most of the world's countries to the "marginals", it is time to look for blame where it lies.

The progressive policies of socialism have eroded security,
Sadly, this erosion of security will call for more state,
More state will suck more out of security.
We will end up with a welfare shithole.
Where you can raise a family on government dole, but cannot guarantee the working man's security on his way back from work.
Non-producing are welfared, the producing are dead. 
Congratulations!

Smelly Media: Left is theft

Whenever I think I am going overboard with my thinking that if lefties are not evil, they are mental, and this mostly depends on where on the hierarchy they see themselves, if the party would gain full control... interlude:

I do not think any of my leftier than left friends consider themselves part of the peasants that starved in the name of the omelette, or the thousands of eggs cracked under the guilliotine in the name of the omelette; the cracked egg that were part of the necessary rational system. No, the intelligent ones see themselves as part of the central planners, and these are not the mental ones.

Yea, so whenever I think I am going overboard, the left gift horse keeps on giving, and this is happening sadly daily.

Left want new tax for the well to do

Left Alliance parliamentary group chair Annika Lapintie has proposed a so-called solidarity tax for those with yearly incomes topping 60,000 euros.

Left is theft.
This is the crux of the issue.
There is progressive taxation.
Meaning,
The ones earning more are paying more than just more taxes than the ones earning less, they are paying an extra premium on their earnings.
If one earns 20.000 and pays 4.000 tax, with linear taxation, one earning 60.000 would pay 12.000... But no, this is unequal, so the one earning 60.000 is taxed to something from 20.000 to 30.000 of his money.
What is the government giving as benefits to this person for his shamelessly high taxation?
Nothing.
Just the promise of no rioting.
So, this theft is basically the not-haves blackmailing the trying-to-haves with the threat of break in peace.
Since no amount of income taxation can touch the already-hads, they are happily enjoying the elites stealing from the trying-to-haves to give to the not-haves, with no expense to them. 
Socialism works, until you run out of someonelse's money. Thatcher.
But yea, let's assume that the left wants this tax for productive purposes.
Assumption. Wrong.

The tax would bring hundreds of millions of euros into state coffers in hard times, says Lapintie, adding that the money could help pay for publicly financed services and pay off state debt.

First reason: Publicly financed services.
She is not talking about roads, dams or infrastructure. Those are paid for by relevant taxes.
She is talking about the welfare state.
She is talking about Robin Hooding our way to a total economic collapse.
The second reason.
State debt.
Was it accrued for roads, dams or infrastructure? No. They were paid by relevant taxes used in their production and during their use.
She is talking about state debt that came out because the welfare state was handing out goodies.
Now that the have-nots are gotten used to the goodies, there is no turning back.
So, yea, Robin Hooding ourselves to a total economic collapse.
Why work? Would be the question I expect the younger generation to ask themselves.

Lapintie points out that a similar solidarity tax has been introduced in Greece and Portugal to shore up state funds in the debt-wrecked countries.

Which if I may remind the leftie, are EUs more socialist countries, whose welfare was paid for by the northern EU states, mostly the Germans.

Yea yea, ze Germans are filthy rich, the capitalistic f¤ckers...


Now that we are talking about it:

AL: Pensions to rise by more than wages

Pensions are to rise by more than wages from the turn of the year, reports the Tampere daily Aamulehti. Earnings-related pensions are set to rise by 3.6 percent, while state pensions will go up by 3.8 percent, each more than one percentage point more than wages.

Salaries are scheduled to rise by just 2.4 percent, according to the national framework agreement on incomes agreed last month.

Every week there is news of some big firm letting people go.. In tens, in hundreds.
But pensioners cannot take a little wavy ride in the crumbling economy.
I got nothing against the generation who fought the second world war to get their pensions. The hell they went through...
But anyone born after 1945 does not deserve any special treatment.
If the working people are going through crap economy, so shall the generation which was born after the war.
How will the state pay for all this?
People are getting sacked, the economy is going down the shitters (wait till Greece defaults or is sacked, the other's follow... Hell yesterday Belgium gave a warning...); but can't trouble the welfareists.
Because before this news came there were news about welfare increments.
Who is going to pay for this?

Pensioners’ association director Hannu Partanen estimates that pensioners will also get a bigger increase than wage-earners in 2012.

My fear is that one day the elderly will get too expensive for the state.

And since they won't be rioting like the welfareists in Greece, the vibrants in London, and since their generation was the one who screwed family values,having their children care squat for their independent elders,

The future looks bleak indeed.

Especially if the lefties get full power, with the proven socialist track record...

But until then,

Just keep on stealing from the working.

Until the goose says f¤ck you... if it does not die before that.

Smelly Media: Killing the west piece by piece

Feminism reducing birthrate,
Equality tuning into totalitarianism,
Immigration importing haters,
Envirofascism stopping production,

All done in the good of what?

The children?

The world?

How does the depopulation of Europe help the world's population problem when Africa is (literally) multiplying geometrically?
How does the envirofascism imposed on European production help the world when China, India, Africa, etc care squat about the environment?
How does immigration help the future children when Santa will be outlawed as offensive?

But no,

Europe, and European institutions continue on the deadly track of suicide.

The self hatred, and the hatred of the productive is so apparent in the article, disgust is a word that would stay too light.

Audit Office slams commuter deductions

Finland's National Audit Office criticises commuter tax deductions for personal transport. The authority says mileage deductions run directly counter to Finland's environmental targets.

A tsunami of an economic crisis is at our door step, and "SLAM" goes the Audit Office; people who want to work, who travel to work, should not get the mileage deductions, which btw, if I am right start only counting at one way distances of more than 50 km.

Housing is way overpriced, not exlainable by material costs, but by imposed housing rules of the governments and maybe the monopoly of the construction companies. Especially in the center of cities. Way overpriced.

And then, a flat that takes almost one third of my after tax income is given freely to an unemployed or an immigrant "because we don't want to cause ghettos to form", further reducing available housing (as especially the unemployed immigrants want to stay in the three main cities, in the center, and well, they get it, for free), and the government giving money for rent causing rent and housing prices to shoot... 

Fuck the environmental targets. 

I'm known for drinking the lake water in which I swim, the forests are forests and there is zero, zero air pollution even in the city center where I am (ok, 7-8 am, and 4-5 pm, may have some smell of exhaust.. but that is it)

If the Finns (and us, living here) would cease to exist today, it would not make a dent in the amount of pollution China and India, and Russia, etc is bringing onto this world.

I may be shortsighted, and bigoted, but at least am not open minded enough that my brains fell off.

The west is also polluting but it is exclusively the west which is researching clean energies and how to reduce pollution; all the while killing its own production by the regulations.

Its report says mileage deductions encourage long commutes, increasing the amount of traffic on roads.

Right.

So these people who commute these long hours, who also pay the taxes should quit work, and get on welfare, to get those expensive apartments in the city centre for free?

According to the report, around half a million Finns benefit from the tax break. Single-passenger commuting has a cumulative effect. In 2008, commuter deductions exceeded funds Finland spent on curbing greenhouse emissions.

Considering that 500.000 is 20% of the working age population, and 22% of the actual working, I would say that they do deserve some commuting tax break... Hell, it is not even a direct handout, as it is given to the 250.000 unemployed, including the state subsidized professional baby machines popping out future unemployables.

But as we all know, the unemployed do not cause carbon emissions.

And then if single passenger commuting has such a big effect, why not installing faster trains, and making train travel less expensive than single passenger car travel?

I take the car, even when I am driving myself, because fuel + coffee break is cheaper than the train. Public transportation, my ass. Same for the inner city buses. Car once you have it, is cheaper already for a single driver.

Recently, the Ministry of Transport and Communications said that Finland’s greenhouse gas emissions from transportation still exceed its goals outlined in the Kyoto Protocol, an international climate agreement to slow down global warming.

After the Climategate Scandal, that some Finnish institutions and the Finnish Media still splurt the crap about Gloooobaaaal Waaaammmiiiinnngggg, is the sign that these people are not friends.

They are not working for whom they claim to be working, and they do not have Finland's best interests in mind.

Replace Finland with Germany, UK, whatever western country.

How long will an economy survive punishing its productive members?

If there will be a second coming of Christ, or a comparable figure, Europe will be the new example of Sodom and Gomorrah.

Smelly Media: Kudos to this guy, screw the partisan media

So one guy made a life for himself, learned two languages, and is active in making society a better place.

My respects to him.

Does it need a full page media article?

Meet Ahmed, a Swedish-speaking Finnish Somali

Cool.

Like I said, my respects to him.

Now, which is more worthy of the news?

One Somalian* learning two languages and working (reportedly) for the good of the society,

Or, Somalians* (12.000) having  3.7-4** kids per woman while possessing a 55% unemployment rate, and studies across Europe showing that the children of welfare recipients are statistically more likely to be welfare recipients themselves?***,****

Which will have a greater impact on the society, indigenous and immigrant alike?

See,


The respectable man on this article, has gotten one article.

The Refugee Woman of the Year has gotten three articles. Here, here, here

Ok, got to give points where it is due, the suspected terrorists got eight articles.  (besides three or more others, all more detailed, more general, and more warning,  about homegrown western terrorism)

And the 6600+ living on welfare, giving birth to 3.33+ kids have been mentioned in one sentence in one general article about unemployment, and one sentence in one general article about birth rate.

I will be called racist and hatemonger for seeing this discrepancy.




Oh, and this main news outlet forgot to mention that 25-45% of rapes are committed by foreigners. (An article at the local paper last week, that I will touch on later this week, where it is hinted at that it is not the New Zealanders or the Old French doing the raping)  Maybe we should call them New Finns? "Foreigner" is racial profiling.


P.s.: I also know of a somalian university student, who is a good sportsman, who studies hard, works to get through his studies, and is overall a good student and a good person. He is doing what thousands of others are doing.  I know an Afghan, Iranian, Iraqi, Finn, Estonian, Latvian, French, Colombian, Pakistani, Indian, Turkish, Mexican, Italian, Spanish, German, Japanese, Korean, Chinese, etc etc... Who all are doing this.

Then the Kenyan or Ghanian looking man who takes medical courses at the university, coming to the university with crutches even at -20 degrees, walking at half speed through the cold, gets my uttermost respect.

But knowing these  two respectable members of the society does not change the facts; which, surprisingly, have been reported in the media, albeit hardly noticeable.


Notes:

I have thought long on posting this or not. In today's free speech, opening your mouth will cause you to get the boot of PC stuffed into it, thus these notes to clarify somethings:

* Somalians are talked about in this post because the newspaper is talking about the one Somalian. If the newspaper was talking about the Spaniard that I know, who learned to speak Finnish like a Finn in two years while speaking Spanish, German and English, and then moved on to Russian, Japanese and, I think, also Arabic, then the post would be about Spaniards in Finland. Especially the Erasmus exchange student crowd.

** I looked for the reference where I read the 3.7 or 4.5 number, where the Somalians were the most breeding, with Iraqis the second, but could not find it. This article puts the average birth rate for Africa origined to 3.33%, and it is safe to assume that the Somalians to be on the above average part of that equation.

*** Just google. Last week there was an article coming out in Sweden, and similar stories and studies emerge from all over the continent. And in other studies not looking at the ethnicity, still what is found: Parent on welfare almost equal child on welfare. So in this case it can be clear that I am not after the ethnicity but after the numbers 55% and 3.33+%.

**** For the multiculti diversity trolls, before you call me racist, and such, I am merely reporting what the newspapers have already reported. And asking some logical questions. Of course in your language logic = hate.

Smelly Media: When facts are racist

President Halonen: Racism will not remove injustice

Forgive me for not understanding the title. I do presume there is something lost in translation here.

President Tarja Halonen says the increased incidence of racist comments in Finland is a symptom of the dark side of worldwide globalisation.

Which, of course is the fault of the western people?

What about coming out with the historical tested and tried true fact for eons:

"Diversity and proximity equals war" ??

Ok, so if globalisation has a dark side as racism, does racism come out of nothing, or does globalization force something on normal people so they turn racist?

Or race realist?

Maybe self defensist? (I know the word does not exist)

Would the dark side of globalisation be weakened if the borders were tightened? Ooops. That is racist. Näää... It is borderist. discriminating between the borders.

If racism is a symptom of a dark side, what is the cause? What is the dark side?

What if talking about the dark side is now branded racism?

Speaking on the Arto Nyberg interview programme on Sunday, she said intolerance grew from unjust experiences that racism could not solve. The President reminded Finns that the language and practice of intolerance fed unwanted phenomena. But she noted this was a problem facing many nations such as France, Holland the United States, for example.

Unwanted phenomena: Immigrant family living in the center of town in a 150 square meter apartment, (min 1500 euros rent), father jobless, mother busy popping future geniuses (4 kids), getting 1500 euros in direct welfare support, besides other benefits. 

Unwanted phenomena: Rape statistics.

Definitely a problem of language.

A language, that has eliminated the word: No.

And the problem facing many nations as she mentions is not the racism of the indigenous people, it is the cause of this race based rhetoric.

What?

Will we blame the swedish and norwegian immigrant rape epidemic on the swedish and norwegian girls because they are not sexing enough the insatiable testosterone riddled macho mutants?

Will we blame the reporters for reporting it? (yes, they are blamed)

She called on opinion makers such as journalists, politicians, the clergy and teachers to break the chain of hate speech.

What if logical discourse nowadays is called hate speech?

We can just go and close all the (non-mainstream) media outlets and schools directly.

As any non-elite person with two braincells left intact will look around when walking on the street and open his mouth.

Anything that comes out will qualify to be "racist".

Are the words the problem or the reason for the words?

Will eliminating "hate speech" eliminate the growing problem that is on its way towards extensive damage at best?

Here is a public announcement that the president should make:

"We do not accept that people living in our borders do not respect Finnish traditions and basic human rights. Christmas carols will not be silenced, and honor violence will not be tolerated. Any person thinking otherwise, acting otherwise will be deported"

Just this weekend walking in the streets with four other guys I encountered racism.

Some skinheads walking by muttered "Fucking Afghanis".

And?

Nothing and. They continued, we continued. A group consisting of five different nationalities we could care less.

And here is an example of an oppressed class that has racism bestowed upon it:

"Girl dates Finn. Girl is beaten. Finn is beaten". And this is the problem of the Finn, not the problem of the intolerant racist sexist bigot of a family?

See the problem?

You do.

Elites tell us we are the problem.

At this point breaking the hate speech is impossible as the cancer of multi culti has taken over the society and the painful moans of the patient have been branded hate speech.

Heck, at this point, the society choosing to commit euthanasia would be called racist; racist against the cancer of multi culti. Yea. A society that committed suicide because it is racist.

Sounds far off?

Look at Sweden.

Sacrificing its girls for the horn god of diversity.

“Everyone should share responsibility as this was not an issue that could be delegated to others even via the ballot box,” she observed.

A Finns (Westerner's) first duty is to his children. Not to the dysfunctional imports of dysfunctional families from dysfunctional cultures.

When trying to leave a livable country for your grandchildren to grow in is called racism....

Smelly Media: Why the church has turned into a joke, Exhibit 6969: Bending over

Before I will be accused of not liking gays, I have nothing against gays, as long as they keep their private life out of my face, and their hands away from me.

Missionary organizations to lose funding over views on homosexuals

You see, the west is a free culture, the EU is a free collection of countries,

Free, as long as you parrot the party line of sodomy, vibrancy, enrichment, cultural and demographic suicide, and unending guilt for crimes not worse than other culture's.

In this free land, the anointed will decide what is acceptable and use other people's moneys to dictate these enlightened views.

The Parish Union of Helsinki is planning to end financial support to three missionary organisations due to their negative attitudes towards the ordination of women and sexual minorities.

Oh oh oh...
The ladies have been offended.
The ass pirates have also been offended.
We must do something.
Out of hundreds of organisations, one organisation does not bend over backwards to please the gay minority (1%?) and the female minority (52%...????) and that has to be punished.
It is not like these parishes are running around shouting "stone the gays"; "drown the women" etc.. No, they just hold views that they do not want these groups in high positions in their organizations.
Punish the heretic.
How can they defile the Gods of Progression, The Goddesses of Tolerance?

The Parish Union annually gives three percent of its tax revenue—some three million euros—to foreign aid. The money is channelled through several missionary organisations and Finn Church Aid, which carries out humanitarian work.

Actually the news is not clear. They are talking about the church tax, from which one can opt out, but also lose right to church services.
At this point, it is the sensible thing, as soon the church possibly will order its male members to drink gay pxxx instead of red wine, and eat female sxxx instead of that holy bread.
Can't offend them, the LGBT saints,  you see.
Wonder how many church members actually want to have gay priests,
"And Jeeeeesuuuuuussss... Boy you look good.... Why the cloth?  Halllelluuujjaaaa"
Female priests:
"No sermon today. Got PMS"
Or a lesbian priest:
"Jesus was a pig. Men are pigs. God is a transgender. Mary was a lesbian"
Ah well...
I guess soon we shall outlaw
"In the name of the Father, the Son and the Holy Spirit"
As it is offensive.

Following heated public debate on the church's attitude towards homosexuals, the Parish Union took a more critical look at its partner organisations.

I can now hear some discussion about what to do with the cross...

(The following is a work of fiction. Names, characters, places, used language and incidents either are products of the author’s imagination or are used fictitiously. Any resemblance to actual events or locales or persons or objects, living or dead, is entirely coincidental, yada yada yada)

"It's mine"
"No mine!"
"You can't even fit it in"
"I got vaseline"
Third person coming in:
"Screw the cross.. I got the marble snake, gimme some of that vaseline", oops, out pops an apple.



In other news:

The feminazis have already been furious that Jesus is depicted as a man. His actual name was Destinee.

Btw,

The "Church has turned into a  joke, Exhibit 1" is their turning their backs on the traditional family.That was the point when the church lost its way.

Smelly Media: The system wants your children. Totally

After the news report degrading motherhood, something I will blog on later, comes this:

Pressures to extend school day

I was in a school that was full day, and you know what; half the time I spent in the classroom was wasted on me. Bored to death, not allowed to open some useful book on a different topic, I had to sit through hours and hours of bullshit.

The trade union representing teachers in Finland, the OAJ, is calling for longer school days as a part of an upcoming reform in the national curriculum.

More class hours = more teachers & more billable hours = more financial power for the union.

Simple.

It is not about the children.

This is the same mindset that has the audacity to claim that abortion is "for the child" when there is a long waiting list of couples who want to adopt a native Finnish baby.

With wanting to increase the school hours for children, one would think the Finns are illiterate.

Even though Finnish children spend well below the OECD national average of hours in class, academic performance is among the best in the world.

So, we are to break what is not broken, in the name of progress.

This is where it gets interesting:

A new national curriculum for elementary schools is currently being formulated behind closed doors at the Ministry of Education. The group of civil servants working on reforms has not shown the plans even to the OAJ, the union that represents teaching professionals.

Central planning anyone?

Central planning without including the people with hands-on experience?

"Central planning", that has been the most murderous political idea of human existence?

Like the apparatchik poets planning the harvest?
Like the apparatchik chemical engineers planning the waterways?

Interesting this is, the least.

Professor Jouni Välijärvi of the University of Jyväskylä, who coordinates the OECD's Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA) in Finland, says that longer days elsewhere is not a good reason to extend school days here.

Sometimes reasonable (in the real meaning, not the PC bastardized meaning of reason) people do make it to the news.

"There seems to be something in the air in other developed countries urging an increase in the systematic education of small children. I am not convinced that this is wise. It could produce exactly the opposite results intended."

"the systematic education"... Fuck. That sounds like out of some political horror movie, A Brave New 1984.

What is the next step?

The state taking babies at birth into "Newborn Education Facilities"?

Already babies who should be still sucking their mother's tits are given to daycare at 12 months old.

The first words are not "Mom", "Dad", "Pee", "Kaka", but whatever the minimum wage states indoctrinator daycare teacher has taught the baby.

The most happy kids in my circle of friends are the three boys who have a stay at home mother. The boys are golden. They are boys. Wild, fun, happy, curious, territorial but cooperative. And they got a dad who says "Boys are boys" and would not make a big deal if one of them breaks an arm while jumping around. Compare this to the kid who cannot drive the toy Matchbox car fast through the carpet toy town in the kindergarten, because that would make him get used to fast driving. 

Oh, eating mom's cooking instead of government approved crap, these boys are healthy as bulls; growing with mom's teachings, dad's teachings and a love for the family.

The system cannot have that.

The system wants your children, every one of them, in totality.

The system wants to devour the soul of your children, and make them into obedient PC-thinking slaves. 

Ya ya, all in the name of the child.

Smelly Media: To be governed by the clueless

Sometimes there are news articles out there making you wonder...

Tuomioja: "progress towards democracy in Egypt will continue"

Finland's Foreign Minister Erkki Tuomioja believes Egypt's progress towards democracy will continue.

In the meanwhile the country has totally fallen into the hands of the brotherhood.

Churches are being burned.

Kids are being beaten to death because they dared to show the cross hanging on their necks.

Any voice out of the line is made to play the headless horseman. 

Mr. Tuomioja is right, if he considers democracy as the rule of the majority, including the right of the majority to choose to obliterate a minority or not.

What a democracry... More like demogr-ass-y

P.s.: The guys who will win the next election are the same who have protests, e.g. in London, with banners "Democracy is Hypocrisy"

Tuomioja observed certain groups were trying to spread unrest in the run-up to elections next week. However, he believed the army wanted to hand over to a civilian administration.

Funny, the last time an army tried to halt the unrest (rightly or wrongly) it was bombed into oblivion by western forces. Wonder what makes this one so special.

Anyway, our foreign minister apparently decides on our foreign politics based on beliefs, not facts and uncensored news.

But he added the young people behind the Arab Spring would not give up their demands.

“They will not accept a new dictatorship,” he noted.

Unless it is their own...

Smelly Media: "#¤"#¤"%#¤'s in the government

Sometimes you stop and wonder.

Do we have idiots in politics or do they hate their own people.

Eurocrats definitely hate the europeans, but local politicians?

Or are they just intelligent, good willing honorable people who have been brainwashed?

Finland more flexible on Schengen expansion

Finland has shifted its position in negotiations on Bulgaria and Romania joining the Schengen area. Finland will now agree to the removal of border controls in between the Schengen area and those two countries in two stages, provided that sufficient efforts are made to reform justice systems and fight corruption.

Allright. Now it makes sense to change the doors, install triple high security locks, install GPS transmitters into the cars, and hope for the best.

Even with border controls, the free travel possibility screwed my town in Finland with a beggar on every corner, with shady people hanging out in corners, Helsinki is in worse situation, my town in Germany has only one nationality of street musicians left; no more diversity, only one group; Oslo clearly had organized begging in the streets with the one nasty looking young man strolling the streets, providing protection to the beggars.

Yea, just open the borders.

Because we, the law abiding citizens do not matter. We are sheep made for slaughter in the politicans' benefits.

About the emphasized part: I have a pink elephant that can fly.

In September Finland opposed this plan, along with the Netherlands. Schengen expansion has to be approved unanimously by existing members, so the Finns and Dutch were effectively wielding their vetoes.

Somehow I think the dutch will leave the union before the shit hits the fan.

The thing is the shit has filled the room, it will not matter if some more hits the fan or not.

And with their diversity ratio, the Dutch are screwed to oblivion anyway.

But, my best wishes to the Dutch.

Their opposition was grounded in the fear that organised crime in the two countries would create problems if free movement to Schengen countries was granted.

Racists. There is no thing as crime. Crime is a social construct made to oppress unfortunate people with shady choices.

Finland’s position shifted a little yesterday, when Reuters reported that European Affairs Minister Alexander Stubb said that Finland would be willing to take a two-track approach – first opening air and sea borders, before later making a separate decision on land borders.

Stubb will be sacked soon. He is tickling the eurocrats a bit too much.

She added that Finland is waiting on an EU Commission report into efforts to fight corruption and reform the judiciary in Bulgaria and Romania that will be ready in February.

Right.

And I a truly believe that Russia and China will become environmental friendly governments by February.

This kind of wishful thinking coupled with the treason of the Brusselites will be the apocalypse of the west.

Smelly Media: The game of humanism, congratulating yourself out of existence

The happy hippy hippo picture at it again.

Face Festival grabs human rights award

Finland is embracing diversity on Wednesday in celebration of the International Day for Tolerance. The Finnish League for Human Rights awarded the Faces Etnofestival, held annually in Raasepori, this year’s prize for contributing to the advancement of human rights.

What proof is there that "diversity is strength", or "diversity is good"?

It is just another feel good ideology that is dumped down our throats like toilet cleaning liquid.

And this I say, while I am a child of two cultures.

Look at the picture in the text and the only thing I see is a welfare hippy dancing in the mud, high on grass. I may be wrong, but in this day and age where image is everything, this counts a lot.

Here, I give also an award:

The League says that the Faces festival has long done comprehensive work to promote human rights. Last summer’s festival theme was “Viva la difference”, a celebration of diversity.

Heh.. Viva la difference.

You see, if you are in the academic circle (like I am), this is true. Everyone is educated, everyone is trying to make something of their life, be productive, get along, learn other cultures etc, and you know what, we are the minority in the diversity. And, we are not a protected minority, because we are not vibrant/enriching enough.

If you are in the hippie circle, then you probably will not be faced with any enriching vibrant minorities anyway; the foreigners that will create diversity in your ranks will be the mellow yellow ones.

If you are in the leftist circles, then you will tolerate any an all bad aspects of diversity in the name of the Leftie Father, Jesus Leftie, and the Holy Left Spirit.

Get out to the real world, and then you see that diversity, once it reaches a tipping point will vibrate the society into a mutation of its former self, just like cancer mutates the breast tissue.

But yea,

Viva la difference!

Since all you are able to recognize are the different food courts and the possibility of sex with exotic looking people.

The rest is just made up imaginations of the racists.

The prize is now awarded for the tenth time. Previous winners included secretary general of the Finnish Disability Forum Pirkko Mahlamäki and immigration counsellor Melody Karvonen.

Congratulations, if what they did helped people.

The International Day for Tolerance has been observed since 1996. The UN-declared day emphasises acceptance of diversity and everyone's right to live according to their own beliefs.

Emphasis mine.

Let's say one believes in: (People that I met, yes..)

- Having sex with a ten year old is ok if the parents are ok with it.
- Having sex with donkeys is fun.
- Killing your sister if she is not a virgin on marriage is ok.
- Killing your wife if she is not a virgin on marriage is acceptable.
- Killing because one insulted your mother is ok.
- Burning dogs alive is ok, as dogs are sinful creatures.
- Not allowing a girl out of the house is ok.
- Not sending a girl to school is ok.
- Justice is to be served on blood basis, leading to blood feuds are tradition.
- More that I care not to dig out from my memory...

Or, from the news,

- Cutting away a girls clitoris is tradition
- Marrying a ten year old is tradition
- Beating up a girl because she held hands with a guy is tradition
- Beating up that guy is tradition and fun
- Killing because the dead one criticized religion, is mandated
- Raping a girl to revenge her family is payback
- "Eating Pygmies give superman powers" is a common belief, leading to manhunts in the jungle.
- Raping western girls is acceptable because they have sex anyway.
- Throwing acid on women who have no headscarf is a mandatory action.
- Just open the news and insert an item that smells of diversity; there is no shortage.

So, the UN tells me I got to tolerate those beliefs,

But saying that I do not tolerate those beliefs is to be intolerated.

I am the criminal. For being the real humanist.

Right.

Smelly Media: If this is not populism, what is?

I was going to write Left is Theft for the title, but this candidate is not from the left, and that title is reserved for a future post about the Left.

The news during the last election and all the time after that were filled with news about "The populist Finns Party" etc... They were populist, because they applied to the feelings of 20% or so Finns who thought their country was being given away to others.

Populist now meant "speaking to the people, but speaking politically incorrect words"...

The original definition was: kind of speaking for the people against the elites

Like this one social researcher I met, "I am now researching how populist parties like the Finns get their power"; with disgust in his face.

Allright then, since we got populist as being that, what is this:

Niinistö: Higher taxes for the rich an option

Presidential candidate Sauli Niinistö of the National Coalition Party said in an interview with the YLE breakfast show Ykkösaamu that an increase in taxation for the rich is not out of question. According to Niinistö, the greatest problem facing the Finnish society is marginalisation.

So, since this is line with the PC crap, this is not populism.

Saying something which appeal to 80% of the population is no populist because it does not say anything politically incorrect...

Great.

"We are Robin Hood, we take from the rich and give to all."

There in the corner is a group of farmers, who want to be left alone; "Filthy populists... Playing with peoples emotions to get into parliament"

The tragic comedy seems to never end.

Niinistö said that the issue of higher taxation for the rich will surface when the budget has to be patched up.

What he is saying, they will not close the leaks, they will not go to restriction in any aspect of the welfare system, but will demand the "rich" will chime in.

Now, since you cannot be taxed on what you already have, this will not affect the trust fund babies, or the ones rich by birth.

Once again, the ones trying to make something better out of their life will be pushed back into the boiling cauldron of equality at the lowest level.

He called a greater tax burden for the rich “extremely important insofar as a sense of justice is concerned.”

What justice is there in taxing someone 50% because they earn more than others, and now taxing them even more?

What incentive is left to be creative, productive, and hardworking?

Who is gonna run the economy? Who is going to build the next Nokia?

The welfare mums?

The enterpreneur, the researcher, the engineer, the idea man that has not much left after being taxed more than 50%...?

It is already a progressive system. You earn 20.000, you pay 20%, you earn 50.000%, you pay 50%... Where is the effing justice in that?

It is theft.

Legal theft.

Niinistö said that the most serious problem of Finland’s society is marginalisation, especially among children. He urged everyone to take responsibility for preventing people’s social exclusion.

Of course this is not populism.

It is for the children.

Yea, you know for the children.

Like not cherishing moms divorcing the dads for... insert arbitrary pop-reason

Ooops. I just committed blasphemy.

Who said it, was it Hitler or Stalin? I think it was Hitler, something like "I can get people do anything if I say it is for the good of the children"...

The state destroyed the family unit, the church forgot there was once a family, and now we, the people who chose not to raise bastards, once again chime in for the children...

Sh%t, it is time there is a state-blowjob service installed for men paying taxes but not receiving any direct benefits.

Some more funny assumptions:

According to Niinistö, Finland might have to contemplate Nato membership if European cooperation fails to satisfy Finland’s defence needs.

What European Army?

(I see only Germany and England as possible forces that would be able to raise some kind of armed forces when necessary)

Smelly Media: The Love Connection

Allright NATO may not be the best thing right now, but where would Europe's so cherished welfare be if we would not live under the umbrella of the US military protection. Even Finland, which is not in NATO only has managed to spare change for a welfare system because it could keep its military at a joke level, compared to Russia.

But that is not the love connection. The love connection comes later.

Stubb under fire for behavior at Nordic Council meeting

Somebody has been a bad boy... Can't have that! Bad boy, bad boy, shame on you.

European Affairs Minister Alexander Stubb raised eyebrows at a meeting of Nordic foreign ministers in Copenhagen on Wednesday. Members of the Finnish delegation were upset by Stubb's behaviour at the meeting, which they said showed open disinterest.

Maybe it is because all the decisions were pre-decided, all was done, nothing said would change anything? Which is not the topic either, but here it comes:

“Yesterday’s conference was good. Just as I love the EU I also love Nordic cooperation—this is really exciting, important and fun,” Stubb told YLE.

Right.

So why does he love the EU? Today, someone saying they love the EU, unless they are part of the EU elite - Eurocrats, banksters and their bedfellows - ,is akin to a person saying, "I love my rapist. And I love that my rapist will rape my children. And then when the rapist gets tired of me, and my children, the rapist will rape my grandchildren; oh how much I love my rapist..."... Just does not make sense.

On the Nordic Cooperation,

He is having fun, it is exciting... Wow... Perfect way to describe the necessity of a cooperation... It is important too.. Wow... Whom does it benefit tho?

Apparently not the Nordic people:

Finland holds the 2011 Nordic Council chairmanship. According to Finland’s Ministry for Foreign Affairs, discussions centred on the current situation in North Africa and Palestine, and particularly on women’s rights in those areas.

Why can I somehow not manage to move myself emotionally for these problems?

Shame me for having a narrow vision.

Smelly Media: Our Presi-multiculti-dent joins the witchhunt.

Halonen hopes for bold opposition to racism

I definitely agree.

I boldly oppose the racism in the wolf packs of cultural enrichers who try to intimidate the locals by their numbers and behavior.

I boldly oppose in the racism of vibrant families who vibrate their daughters if they are seen with a local.

I boldly oppose the racism the imported poor souls dish upon me when I am walking by; especially if they are present in their numbers.

I boldly oppose the racism that states it is ok to rape western girls because it is not so bad for them.

Is our presi-multi-dent happy?

No, because I just mentioned things that we should tolerate under "all cultures are equal and welcome except of course the western/finnish/goodwilling foreign"

She is talking about Finns, and non-Finns, seeing the influx of intolerant, non-working, aggressive, unthankful, (add adjective) people coming over, getting fed, housed, educated and then still crying a river of racism.

About us, whose taxes are going to unemployable imports.

About us, whose economic future is not looking bright, and who are not an oppressed class, who are not counted unfortunate, who cannot expect to live like kings on welfare dole.

Let's see:

President Tarja Halonen is hoping for bolder opposition to racism in Finland. In an interview with Helsingin Sanomat published on Sunday, Halonen said that party leaders, civil servants and ordinary citizens have roles to play in standing up against racism.

What about the roles of the foreigners to stand up against the rotten apples in their ethnic groups?
Oh, now that sounded racist, sorry. Can't ask any group to take responsibility for harboring rotten apples. Nonono...
What about ethnic groups taking action against the welfare queens, kings and harems on welfare?
Opps, I must be a racist.
There is a reason, Mrs. President, that shops are going bankrupt when they customers start to become vibrant. Oh, did I mention that female vibrants are missing from public life? But yea, all cultures should be tolerated. Even those where the women are fully utilized as breeding machines, and the western girl are used as sperm urinals. All good. No prob. Our taxes will help the fallout of that, too.

According to Halonen, it is crucial to oppose racism in everyday life. She says that racism is ’bubbling’ in society, and that it bursts into the open from time to time.

When you call looking out for your children "racism", what she is asking is to abandon all hope, ye idiots.
There are two ways of looking at this:
The comparably peaceful and tolerant Finnish/western/scandinavian culture is a raving racist maniac;
Or the people who escaped unfortunate conditions bleepholes bring the culture with them, the culture that is one of the reasons that the bleephole was a bleephole.
The first way is the PC way. Blame it on the west. The way of the politicians and the media.
The second way. You effing racist.
P.s.: When the bleephole exports are behaving tribal we are to say "it is their culture"; when the Finns (or lawful, productive foreigners) behave tribal, it is racism.
Yup.

The president is particularly concerned about the hardening of language.

Allright, so how does she suggest people communicate their observations, thoughts, and feelings?

Halonen’s comments were made in regard to an earlier Helsingin Sanomat poll on racism in society. In an interview with Centre Party organ Suomenmaa, controversial Finns Party MP Jussi Halla-aho criticised a recent statement by Halonen that ”people who recognise their own racist traits vote for the Finns Party.”

You see, she is unfortunately mistaken about the reason.

It is not the Finns recognising their own racist traits voting for the Finns Party,

It is the Finns who are recognizing the traitorous racist traits in the other parties that are openly racist against their own people, that vote for the Finns Party.

The hatred of the western culture, the hatred for their own people is oozing out a bit more everyday; and ordinary people who respect the spilled sweat, blood and tears to create a civilization in this frozen hellhole are starting to smell the stink.


Later addition: So what comes to mind is the racist Finnish flag that is so oppressively flying over every apartment building on special days. What happens one day when a enough number of oppressed enrichers come together (from previous news about Neo-Nazis, 30 was an alarmingly large number, so let's stick to 30), say 30, and claim that the proudly flying Finnish flag is oppressive against them, and it is racist, and either the flag shall not be flown, or in every town, flags shall be flown according to the ethnic make up of the towns .

What then? The Christmas carols have left the building in many daycares and some elementary schools, if they have not gone, they are called the Holiday Carols...

What about the Finnish flag? Will it be flown? Or will it change from the blue cross on white ground to a rainbow on a white ground to signify diversity?

See, this question may seem like science fiction, but it is closer than many think.

It is just that 30 signatures have not yet been collected.